Friday, October 23, 2015

Reformation Day Links

"What Is Reformation Day All About?"
On Friday, much of the culture will be focused on candy and things that go bump in the night. Protestants, however, have something far more significant to celebrate on October 31. Friday is Reformation day, which...
Reformation ideas from the  Old Lutheran: The Center of Lutheran Pride! (But not too proud.) 

Martin! God Loves You! A great children's DVD about Martin Luther from Vision Video:

The Lasting Religious Impact ofthe German Reformation
 by Christina Kelley

Have you ever read an English translation of Martin Luther's 95 Theses?  How many of them do you agree with?
95 Theses:  Out of love for the truth and the desire to bring it to light, the following propositions will be discussed at Wittenberg, under the presidency of the Reverend Father Martin Luther, Master of Arts and of Sacred Theology, and Lecturer in Ordinary on the same at that place. Wherefore he requests that those who are unable to be present and debate orally with us, may do so by letter.In the Name our Lord Jesus Christ. Amen. 
1. When our Lord and Master Jesus Christ said, "Repent" ( Matthew 4:17 ), he willed the entire life of believers to be one of repentance.
2. This word cannot be understood as referring to the sacrament of penance, that is, confession and satisfaction, as administered by the clergy.
3. Yet it does not mean solely inner repentance; such inner repentance is worthless unless it produces various outward mortification of the flesh.
4. The penalty of sin remains as long as the...

 YouTube Resources:
 
Reformation Polka  A fun little ditti about Martin Luther and the Reformation

Martin Luther (1953) Niall MacGinnis Full Historical Biography Film  This is an old black and white movie but one of my favorites.

Martin Luther - PBS Documentary - Part 1 of 2

Martin Luther: Heretic

 

Sunday, October 11, 2015

Proverbs 17-30 Thoughts and Observations


Proverbs 17.
Whoever restrains his words has knowledge,
and he who has a cool spirit is a man of understanding.
Even a fool who keeps silent is considered wise;
when he closes his lips, he is deemed intelligent.

The idea of a calm "cool" spirit is paired with restrained speech like Jesus in 1 Peter 2.23.
Father, give me the knowledge and understanding to entrust myself to You like Jesus did.


Over and over the book of Proverbs emphasizes wisdom to walk in the way and fear of/trust in the Lord as guiding principles as opposed to overconfident trust in oneself and disregard for others. These three verses work together to make that point again.
Proverbs 18.10-12
The name of the LORD is a strong tower;
The righteous run to it and are safe.
The rich man's wealth is his strong city, ...

And like a high wall in his own esteem.
Before destruction the heart of a man is haughty,
And before honor is humility.



In the middle of these warnings to disreputable fools and corners is a reminder of how consistent regular time in the Word helps to keep us in the way of knowledge.
Proverbs 19.25-29
25 Strike a scoffer, and the simple will become wary;
Rebuke one who has understanding, and he will discern knowledge.
26 He who mistreats his father and chases away his mother Is a son who causes shame and brings reproach....

27 Cease listening to instruction, my son,
And you will stray from the words of knowledge.
28 A disreputable witness scorns justice,
And the mouth of the wicked devours iniquity.
29 Judgments are prepared for scoffers,
And beatings for the backs of fools.

Lord, don't let me get to busy to listen to you.


This trio of verses seems to encourage dilligent market research and shrewd dealing to help insure the best deal.
Proverbs 20.12-14
The hearing ear and the seeing eye,
The LORD has made them both.
Do not love sleep, lest you come to poverty; ...

Open your eyes, and you will be satisfied with bread.
"It is good for nothing," cries the buyer;
But when he has gone his way, then he boasts.



Proverbs 22 works together with the first two verses pairing with the last two verses and verse three functioning as a thesis statement for the chapter.
"To do righteousness and justice
Is more acceptable to the LORD than sacrifice."

That theme is reinforced on a more personal level by two similar verses that divide the chapter into three sections (9 &19).


#2 of the 30 wise sayings is the first of a trio that warn against perils. Raw abuse of power against the poor and defenseless should be stopped by the legal system. Even when the legal system is used against them watch out for the lowly ones, You would be ignorant and foolish to think God will never respond.
Proverbs 22.22-23
"Do not rob the poor because he is poor,
Nor oppress the afflicted at the gate (court);...

For the LORD will plead their cause,
And plunder the soul of those who plunder them."

Lord, help me remember that you are watching and just because I can doesn't mean I should.


This is the last of the first Decalogue of the Thirty Wise Sayings." It is interesting that the first and last saying in this section are about how the poor have a defender. Here God is called the poor's redeemer. Those who would abuse the poor should beware.
Proverbs 23.10-11
Do not remove the ancient landmark,
Nor enter the fields of the fatherless;
For their Redeemer is mighty; ...

He will plead their cause against you.
http://www.gotquestions.org/kinsman-redeemer.html



Proverbs 24.15-16
"Do not lie in wait,
O wicked man, against the dwelling of the righteous;
Do not plunder his resting place;
For a righteous man may fall seven times ...

And rise again,
But the wicked shall fall by calamity
."
What a comfort to know that defeat (and failure) are not permanent for the righteous! Thank you, Lord, for your faithfulness to your own.



Proverbs 26 talks about seven perverted types of humanity (25.28-26.28). Verses 20-22 focus on the slanderer that stirs up strife.
20 Where there is no wood, the fire goes out;
And where there is no talebearer, strife ceases.

21 As charcoal is to burning coals, and wood to fire,
So is a contentious man to kindle strife.
...
22 The words of a talebearer are like tasty trifles,
And they go down into the inmost body
.
Lord, help me to recognize tasty truffles for what they are and honor you with the words of my mouth.



Diligence. U$e it or lo$e it. Complacent attitudes toward wealth or people can lead to loss.
Proverbs 27.23-24
Be diligent to know the state of your flocks,
And attend to your herds;
For riches are not forever, ...

Nor does a crown endure to all generations.



Though a wise, righteous life usually has positive results. Even in the times it doesn't, it is better to maintain your integrity.
Proverbs 28.6
Better is the poor who walks in his integrity
Than one perverse in his ways, though he be rich.


Pride and anger are a dangerous combination that inflame each other. Lord, please keep me out of that cycle.
Proverbs 19.22-23
An angry man stirs up strife,
And a furious man abounds in transgression.
A man's pride will bring him low, ...

But the humble in spirit will retain honor.



Proverbs 30.32-33
"If you have done foolishly by exalting yourself or if you have planned evil,
put your hand over your mouth!
For as the churning of milk produces butter and as punching the nose produces blood,
so stirring up anger produces strife."

This reminds me of the verse in Job when he realized he was unqualified to question God and said he was going to put his hand over his mouth. Sometimes we just need realize something is not profitable or pleasing to the Lord and just stop saying anything. Oh, Lord, give us that special timely grace!

Thursday, October 8, 2015

The Gospel of Mark: A Serving Savior 2015-2016 / Lesson 5 --“Teaching with Parables”-- Mark 4:1-34

Lesson 5 --“Teaching with Parables”-- Mark 4:1-34
ID: Inductive Questions (Asking the text questions like who, what, where, when, why, & how?”)
CR: Cross References (Comparing Scripture to Scripture, understanding the vague by the clear.)
WS: Word Study (Understanding definition, theological meaning, and usages in other passages.)

The WORD: What does the Bible say?
Context:  Read Mark 3:31-4:41 to help understand the context of this passage.  Read Mark 4:1-34 in a more literal or more dynamic translation than you usually use.  Also, read Isaiah 6:9-10.
Context: Chapter three highlights a variety of responses to Christ’s ministry ranging from the disciples to the scribes.  How do they color our understanding of the Parable of the Soils? 
(Also, before you begin to study the five parables in this lesson it would be helpful to scan through the ten principles for interpreting parables in the article below.)
1.      ID: (4:1-8)  Who/what are the main characters/items in this story?  What occurs at the end?  (Make a visual summary.)
2.      WS/CR: (4:9-12)  Why did Jesus say He was telling parables (parabolē)?  What does “hear” mean in this context?  How did that fulfill Isaiah 6: 10? (Matthew 13:10-17)
3.      ID: (4:14-20)  After identifying what the elements of this parable meant, what do you think is the main focus or application of this parable?  What does it mean to bear fruit?
4.      ID: (4:21-32)  Identify these things in each of these four parables.  1. Who are the main characters/items?  2. What occurs at the end?  3. What is the main focus of this illustration?  (mustard seed)
5. ID: (4:1-34)  Make a list of repeated words, phrases, or ideas?  What do you make of this?

The WALK: What should I do?
1. What soil are you tempted to revert back to?
2. How does Satan snatch away the Word?  How does he attempt to snatch the Word from you?
3. Do you only experience joy and growth in the good times?  How do we sink down roots to sustain us during difficult times?
4. What are the specific things in your life that tend to choke out the Word?
5. What makes soil good for bearing fruit?

6.     Where in this passage do we see Gospel truths about God, Man, Christ, and our response?  Have your sins been forgiven?
Going Beyond:  1. What areas of theology are touched on in this passage?
q The Bible   q God  q God the Father   q Jesus Christ    q The Holy Spirit    q Man   q Salvation   q The Church         q Angels & Satan   q Future Things

By Kevin Halloran  © Unlocking the Bible 2014
1. Understand the nature of the parables.
Parables are tools to compare something physical to something spiritual. Jesus begins several parables by saying “The Kingdom of God is like…” so he could tie an abstract concept (the Kingdom of God) to something more concrete and visible (like a mustard seed in Matthew 13:31-32).
Jesus chose to teach in story form because stories engage the mind and emotions of listeners like no other form of teaching. One great example of this is when Jesus painted a beautiful picture of what “loving your neighbor as yourself” meant when he told the Parable of the Good Samaritan (Luke 10:29-37).
2. Understand the purpose of parables.
Jesus taught with parables for two main purposes: to explain truth to some (see Luke 10:36-37) and to keep truth hidden from others (see Mark 4:10-12 below). For those eager to follow God, parables were memorable illustrations of a kingdom principle. For those opposed to God’s plans, the meaning of the parables would be hidden in a form of judgment.
“And when he was alone, those around him with the twelve asked him about the parables. And he said to them, “To you has been given the secret of the kingdom of God, but for those outside everything is in parables, so that “they may indeed see but not perceive, and may indeed hear but not understand, lest they should turn and be forgiven.”  Mark 4:10-12
3. See the parable in its proper context.
Often times a parable has a brief introduction that will greatly affect its meaning and interpretation. Luke 18:1 shares a key for interpreting the parable that followed when it said, “And he told them a parable to the effect that they ought always to pray and not lose heart. Other times, a parable’s context will inform us that it is directed toward a certain group of people (for example the Pharisees in Luke 15).
Parables are often grouped thematically, and understanding the main thread that ties related parables together can shed light on their overall meaning and interpretation. Luke 15 groups three parables together (the Parable of the Lost Sheep, the Parable of the Lost Coin, and the Parable of the Prodigal Son) to respond to the Pharisees and scribes who were hypocrites that did not understand the grace of God.
4. Remember the cultural gap.
Some of the images and metaphors have rich meaning to people in Jesus’ time that are not as easy to recognize for those living in the 21st century. The Parable of the Ten Virgins (Matthew 25:1-13) makes much more sense when one understands the Jewish marriage customs present at the time of Jesus. A good study Bible will likely have helpful notes to aid you in your study.
5. Parables usually have one main point.
Our understanding of a parable and its details should all flow from the main point (or points). This is a crucial step, because the main point of the parable is the reason Jesus said it in the first place!
Some recommended questions for finding the main point are:
1. Who are the main characters?
2. What occurs at the end?
3. What occurs in quotation marks?
4. Who/What is the focus of the story?  [1]
6. Take notice of surprise details.
Certain parables have shocking and unexpected twists in the story that help us understand the point Jesus was trying to make. Although a careful reading will usually expose the special details, sometimes these details are hard to pick up on due to cultural differences and our familiarity with the parables.
An example of an important and surprising detail is found in the Parable of the Unforgiving Servant (Matthew 18:23-35). The surprise detail of this parable is the difference in the amounts of money forgiven by the king and by the servant (thousands of dollars compared with millions of dollars), which shows the great magnitude of God’s forgiveness of us and how that should lead us to forgive others.
7. Not every minor detail has significant meaning.
Because parables are stories, they sometimes need supporting information in order for the main idea of the parable to make sense and have its power.
For example, in the Parable of the Ten Virgins, the story shares that five virgins were wise and the other five foolish. It would be wrong to conclude that 50% of people are wise and 50% of people are foolish. The fact that there were ten virgins total with five wise and five foolish is an inconsequential detail that merely helps the story progress. Often times pressing on insignificant details can make the story unravel and make one miss the entire point of the story.
8. Notice “stock imagery” in the parables.
“Stock imagery” is a term coined by Robert Plummer for many of the images used repeatedly throughout the parables. Many times repeated images are paralleled in the Old Testament and would have been common spiritual ideas understood by Jesus’ original hearers.
For example, whenever there is a Master/Judge/King figure in the parables, that signifies God, while sheep/servants/workers illustrate followers of God.
9. The ending of parables is very important.
While longer parables share a lot of important details along the way, the key to understanding the implications of the parable is often found in its conclusion. In the parable of the Wheat and the Tares (Matthew 13:24-30), the ending reveals what happens to the wheat and tares respectively and shows the ultimate purpose of the parable which is to indicate that God will judge who is really part of the church at the final judgment.
10. Be careful with allegorical interpretations of parables.
There have been some throughout church history who have thought that the meaning of parables was hidden and unable to be explained without applying special meanings to the text. The problem with this is that they normally disregarded the plain reading of Scripture and offered confusing ideas from the mind of the interpreter.
An example of this is Origen’s interpretation of the Good Samaritan. He reads several details into the text: the man walking down the road signifying Adam, the priest signifying the Law, the Levite signifying the Prophets, the donkey signifying the body of Christ that bore our sins, and the Samaritan signifying what Christ did for us.
There is no basis for such an interpretation. It is much easier to understand when you remember the context: Jesus used the parable to answer a man’s question, “Who is my neighbor?” The Great Reformer Martin Luther called some allegorical interpretations of the parables “amazing twaddle” and “altogether useless.” Avoid these types of interpretations!
As you dig into the deep riches of Christ’s parables, it is our prayer that you develop a deeper grasp on the grace of God, an amplified experience of the Kingdom of God , and a hunger to follow hard after Christ.
Sources:
[1] A Basic Guide to Interpreting the Bible: Playing by the Rules, Robert Stein
The ESV Study Bible | 10 Reasons to Read the ESV Study Bible
Plummer, Robert:  40 Questions about Interpreting the Bible
Snodgrass, Klyne: Stories with Intent: A Comprehensive Guide to the Parables of Jesus


Also check out: “Interpreting Parables” by Michael Vlach / theologicalstudies.org.
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Lesson 5 – Mark 4:1-35
·        This is probably a good time in your study to check with your men to see how they think the study is going.  Sometimes a small adjustment in format or focus can make a significant difference. 
THE WORD
·        Context:  Where did Mark place these parables in his narrative?  Reflecting on the responses to Jesus in chapter three could be helpful in understanding the parables in chapter four. 
·        Make note of the principles for interpreting parables and try not to over think or make things more complicated than they are.
·        2. It is probably significant that this reference to Isaiah’s ministry (who was commissioned to go to a people who had firmly rejected God and were destined to judgment) follows some Scribes deliberate, resolute, and unforgivable blasphemy against the Holy Spirit.  
THE WALK
·        I chose to go deep with the parable of the soils, so the questions primarily focus on that.
THE EXTRAS
·        This is a helpful article on interpreting parables.  You should encourage the men to at least read the headings.
·        There is also a link to another helpful article.

The Gospel of Mark: A Serving Savior 2015-2016 / Lesson 4 - "Crowds and Conflicts" - Mark 3:7-35

Lesson 4 --“Crowds and Conflicts”--Mark 3:7-35
ID: Inductive Questions (Asking the text questions like who, what, where, when, why, & how?”)
CR: Cross References (Comparing Scripture to Scripture, understanding the vague by the clear.)
WS: Word Study (Understanding definition, theological meaning, and usages in other passages.)

The WORD: What does the Bible say?
Context:  Read Mark 3:1-4:3 to help understand the context of this passage.  Read Mark 3:6-35 in a more literal or more dynamic translation than you usually use. 
Context: Mark 3:6 highlights an important transition as the Pharisees (ISBE-WBE) and Herodians (ISBE-BLB) begin planning how they might destroy Jesus.  What five conflicts in chapters 2-3 led up to this opposition?  Do you see any common themes developing?
1.     ID: (3:7-10)  Where did great multitude come from to see Jesus?  Why did they come?
2.     ID/CR: (3:11-12)  How did the unclean spirits respond to Jesus? (James 2:19-20)  What did He warn (order) them not to do? (Mark 1:23-25, 34)
3.     ID: (3:13-19)  Who did Jesus appoint as His disciples (Matthew 10:1-4; Luke 6:12-16)?  Why did he appoint them (14)?  What did He give them power to do?
4.     WS: (3:21-27)  What accusations were made against Jesus?  By whom? What was His response to scribes’ reasoning?
5.     ID/CR/WS: (3:28-35)  What does it mean to blaspheme (blasphēmeō) the Holy Spirit? (Matthew 12:22-32; Luke 12:8-12)  To whom did Jesus direct that warning? (Comb the text for clues before you refer to the article below.)
6.     ID/CR: (3:21, 31-35)  Who was in Jesus’ family (Mark 6:3)?  Why did Jesus’ family want to take him back home?  Who did Jesus claim as his family?

The WALK: What should I do?
1.     What do you think brought two opposing groups together to oppose Christ?  How do we prevent those thoughts and attitudes from taking root in ourselves?
2.     The multitudes came to Jesus because of the things they heard He did.  What causes you to turn toward Him?  Who would you want Jesus to heal?
3.     Are Jesus’ two purposes for His disciples in 3:14 taking place in your life?
4.     Think of an area where it is difficult for you to “do the will of God.”  What concrete step can you take to this next week to bring that area more under His control?
5.     Where in this passage do we see Gospel truths about God, Man, Christ, and our response?  Have your sins been forgiven?
Going Beyond:  1. Read some of the articles about the “unpardonable sin.”
2. Update your Mark charts.  What areas of theology are touched on in this passage?
q The Bible   q God  q God the Father   q Jesus Christ    q The Holy Spirit    q Man   q Salvation   q The Church         q Angels & Satan   q Future Things

What is the “Unforgivable Sin”?
By Andy Rau on his October 10, 2012, GatewayBible.org blog
Last week’s Monday Morning Scripture post highlighted Jesus’ response to accusations that he was in league with the devil himself. In answering his critics, Jesus refers to something that has troubled Christians ever since: the so-called “unforgivable sin.” Here are Jesus’ words:
“I promise you that any of the sinful things you say or do can be forgiven, no matter how terrible those things are. But if you speak against the Holy Spirit, you can never be forgiven. That sin will be held against you forever.” — Mark 3:28-29 (CEV)
Different Bible translations word this differently; some use the phrase “eternal sin” or “unforgivable sin.” In some, the sin is to “blaspheme against” or “curse the Holy Spirit.” Whatever the wording, what troubles many readers is the suggestion that there is a type of sin that God will not forgive. Doesn’t this contradict verses like 1 John 1:9, which state that God will forgive all of our wrongdoing? What exactly is the sin that can’t be forgiven—and is it possible that you’ve committed it, even unintentionally?
These are serious questions. For an answer, I turned to author and apologist Lee Strobel’s Investigating Faith newsletter, where earlier this year he published a thoughtful reflection on a difficult Bible passage. Here’s Lee’s response to the question, “What is the unforgivable sin, and how do I know I haven’t committed it?”
“If you’re worried that you may be guilty of the unforgivable sin, you almost certainly are not,” Rick Cornish aptly points out in his book Five Minute Theologian. “Concern about committing it reveals the opposite attitude of what the sin is. Those who might be guilty wouldn’t care because they have no distress or remorse over the possibility.”
Jesus talked about the unforgivable sin in Matthew 12:31-32: “And I tell you, every sin and blasphemy will be forgiven men, but the blasphemy against the Spirit will not be forgiven. Anyone who speaks a word against the Son of Man will be forgiven, but anyone who speaks against the Holy Spirit will not be forgiven, either in this age or in the age to come.”
Let’s face it – that’s a very sobering teaching! But let’s put it into context. Note that Jesus didn’t address his comments to his disciples or a mere crowd. He was talking specifically to Pharisees who had personally witnessed his miracle of completely and instantly healing a blind and mute demon-possessed man (Matthew 12:22). Rather than acknowledging the obvious fact that Jesus was exercising divine powers, the Pharisees were so spiritually depraved that they attributed his power to Satan (v. 24).
“Their problem was not blind ignorance, but willful rejection,” pointed out Cornish. “That deliberate refusal to believe, even though knowing the truth, seems to be what Jesus called the unforgivable sin.”
As the Quest Study Bible puts it, “Jesus gave the solemn warning in these verses to people whose hard-heartedness placed them on the brink of disaster. Blasphemy against the Spirit evidently is not just a one-time offense; rather, it is an ongoing attitude of rebellion – a stubborn way of life that continually resists, rejects and insults the Holy Spirit. This is what makes it, in effect, an eternal sin (Mark 3:29). Blasphemy against the Spirit is not unforgivable because of something done unintentionally in the past, but because of something being done deliberately and unrelentingly in the present.”
So if you’re an authentic Christian, don’t spend time fretting over whether you have accidentally committed this unforgivable offense. “There is no biblical evidence that a genuine Christian can commit this (unforgivable) sin,” says the Apologetics Study Bible. “Fear that one has done so is probably a good sign that one hasn’t, for full-fledged apostasy is a defiant rejection of everything Christian and lacks the tender conscience that would be worried about such an action.”
Also…
·       “You Asked: What Is the Unforgivable Sin?” -- Jonathan Pennington
·       “What Is the Unpardonable Sin?” -- Clay Jones
·       What is the “unpardonable sin”? / How does sin become “unforgivable”? -- Paul S. Taylor
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------

Lesson 4 – Mark 3:6-35
I have been reflecting on the phenomenon of Jesus being popular with the masses and in conflict with the power brokers in first century Israel.
THE WORD
Context: From time to time there are context questions to help us focus on and understand the bigger picture.  This is important.
1. The Chronological Life of Christ indicates that the locations listed would mean that people could have traveled as much as 120 miles to see Jesus.  This says something about how widespread his reputation was at this time.  Note, while the dedication to travel that far was remarkable, the reason given was not that they believed in Him or wanted to hear his teaching.
3.  Some of the disciples were known by more than one name.  The second part of this question will be revisited in the WALK questions.
4.  This question is not meant to get into the blasphemy against the Holy Spirit. That is the next question.
5.  This is an issue that is clarified by Scripture as a whole, but push the men to glean insights from the text itself before branching off into systematic theology or general concepts from the articles linked from this lesson.
THE WALK
2. The second part of this question may give men an opportunity to share about themselves or someone in their life who is hurting.  This could be an opportunity for you men to get to know each other on a more personal level. 
THE EXTRAS
I picked the article by Andy Rau primarily because it was so short.  There are links to three others that will provide more food for thought.

 

Monday, October 5, 2015

The Gospel of Mark: a Serving Savior / 2015-2016 - Lesson 03 - “Jesus Challenged on the Law” - Mark 2:13-3:6

Lesson 03   “Jesus Challenged on the Law”   Mark 2:13-3:6
ID: Inductive Questions (Asking the text questions like who, what, where, when, why, & how?”)
CR: Cross References (Comparing Scripture to Scripture, understanding the vague by the clear.)
WS: Word Study (Understanding definition, theological meaning, and usages in other passages.)
The WORD: What does the Bible say?
Context:  Read Mark 2:7-3:12 to help understand the context of this passage.  Read Mark 2:13-3:6 ina more literal or more dynamic translation than you usually use.  Read Deuteronomy 5:12-15 and 1 Samuel 21:6?
This passage introduces the ongoing conflicts with the religious leaders about the Jewish Sabbath.  Take so time in this lesson to focus on understanding the Sabbath, it’s regulations, and meanings, etc.
1.     ID: (2:13-17)  Before going to a Bible dictionary, make as many observations about Levi as you can from these verses (Note the parallel accounts in Matt. 9:9-13 and Luke 5:27-32).
2.     ID: (2:16-17)  What kind of people did Jesus come to call?  How did that affect who he associated with?
3.     ID: (2:18-21)  Who questioned Jesus about His disciples not fasting? What reason and parables did Jesus answer them with?  How are they connected?
4.     WS/CR: (2:23, 27-28)  What was the Sabbath? (שַׁבָּת-shabbath /σάββατον-sabbaton) (Exodus 16:23-29; 20:8-11; Deuteronomy 5:12-15)  What rules had been given about keeping (or observing) the Sabbath?  How important was it to keep the Sabbath?  (Leviticus 23:23-32; Nehemiah 13:15-21; Jeremiah 17:21-27; Colossians 2:16; Hebrews 4:1-10)
5.     CR: (2:25-26)  The example Jesus gave about David eating showbread (1 Samuel 21:6) did not involve specific Sabbath rules.  How did it apply to the situation in Mark?  (Extra: Do you think the disciples were ignoring the Sabbath, not breaking the Sabbath, or breaking Sabbath rules and making an exception?)
6.     ID: (2:8)  What caused Jesus to be angry (orgē) and grieved (syllypeō)?  Why didn’t Jesus play it safe and wait till the next day to heal the man with the withered hand?
The WALK: What should I do?
1.     How do we harmonize Jesus’ eating with sinners in this passage with 2 Corinthians 6:14-18?
2.     Have you ever fasted?  How might fasting help you?  What are some precautions that should be kept in mind when we fast?
3.     Have you ever observed or known people who observed rules about a day of rest?  What were some pro’s and con’s you observed?
4.     How do you respond when your “religious expectations” are disrupted or ignored?
5.     Where in this passage do we see Gospel truths about God, Man, Christ, and our response?  Have your sins been forgiven?
Going Beyond: 1. Read an extra article.  Jewfaq.org “Shabbat”;  Chabad.org – “What is Shabbat?”; Grace to You (gty.org) – “Are the Sabbath laws binding on Christians today?”; LetUsReason.org – “They Changed the Sabbath to Sunday”
2. Update your “Miracles in Mark” and “Titles Given to Jesus” charts.

II. History of the Sabbath after Moses.
(Part of an article on the “Sabbath” in the International Standard Bible Encyclopedia ©1915)
1. In the Old Testament:
The early prophets and historians occasionally make mention of the Sabbath. It is sometimes named in connection with the festival of the new moon (2Ki 4:23; Am 8:5; Ho 2:11; Isa 1:13; Eze 46:3). The prophets found fault with the worship on the Sabbath, because it was not spiritual nor prompted by love and gratitude. The Sabbath is exalted by the great prophets who faced the crisis of the Babylonian exile as one of the most valuable institutions in Israel's life. Great promises are attached to faithful observance of the holy day, and confession is made of Israel's unfaithfulness in profaning the Sabbath (Jer 17:21-27; Isa 56:2,4; 58:13; Eze 20:12-24). In the Persian period Nehemiah struggled earnestly to make the people of Jerusalem observe the law of the Sabbath (Ne 10:31; 13:15-22).
2. In the Inter-Testamental Period:
With the development of the synagogue the Sabbath became a day of worship and of study of the Law, as well as a day of cessation from all secular employment. That the pious in Israel carefully observed the Sabbath is clear from the conduct of the Maccabees and their followers, who at first declined to resist the onslaught made by their enemies on the Sabbath (1 Macc 2:29-38); but necessity drove the faithful to defend themselves against hostile attack on the Sabbath (1 Macc 2:39-41). It was during the period between Ezra and the Christian era that the spirit of Jewish legalism flourished. Innumerable restrictions and rules were formulated for the conduct of life under the Law. Great principles were lost to sight in the mass of petty details. Two entire treatises of the Mishna, Shabbath and `Erubhin, are devoted to the details of Sabbath observance. The subject is touched upon in other parts of the Mishna; and in the Gemara there are extended discussions, with citations of the often divergent opinions of the rabbis. In the Mishna (Shahbath, vii.2) there are 39 classes of prohibited actions with regard to the Sabbath, and there is much hair-splitting in working out the details. The beginnings of this elaborate definition of actions permitted and actions forbidden are to be found in the centuries immediately preceding the Christian era. The movement was at flood tide during our Lord's earthly ministry and continued for centuries afterward, in spite of His frequent and vigorous protests.
3. Jesus and the Sabbath:
Apart from His claim to be the Messiah, there is no subject on which our Lord came into such sharp conflict with the religious leaders of the Jews as in the matter of Sabbath observance. He set Himself squarely against the current rabbinic restrictions as contrary to the spirit of the original law of the Sabbath. The rabbis seemed to think that the Sabbath was an end in itself, an institution to which the pious Israelite must subject all his personal interests; in other words, that man was made for the Sabbath: man might suffer hardship, but the institution must be preserved inviolate. Jesus, on the contrary, taught that the Sabbath was made for man's benefit. If there should arise a conflict between man's needs and the letter of the Law, man's higher interests and needs must take precedence over the law of the Sabbath (Mt 12:1-14; Mr 2:23 through Mr 3:6; Lu 6:1-11; also Joh 5:1-18; Lu 13:10-17; 14:1-6). There is no reason to think that Jesus meant to discredit the Sabbath as an institution. It was His custom to attend worship in the synagogue on the Sabbath (Lu 4:16). The humane element in the rest day at the end of every week must have appealed to His sympathetic nature. It was the one precept of the Decalogue that was predominantly ceremonial, though it had distinct sociological and moral value. As an institution for the benefit of toiling men and animals, Jesus held the Sabbath in high regard. As the Messiah, He was not subject to its restrictions; He could at any moment assert His lordship over the Sabbath (Mr 2:28). The institution was not on a par with the great moral precepts, which are unchangeable. It is worthy of note that, while Jesus pushed the moral precepts of the Decalogue into the inner realm of thought and desire, thus making the requirement more difficult and the law more exacting, He fought for a more liberal and lenient interpretation of the law of the Sabbath. Rigorous sabbatarians must look elsewhere for a champion of their views.
4. Paul and the Sabbath:
The early Christians kept the 7th day as a Sabbath, much after the fashion of other Jews. Gradually the 1st day of the week came to be recognized as the day on which the followers of Jesus would meet for worship. The resurrection of our Lord on that day made it for Christians the most joyous day of all the week. When Gentiles were admitted into the church, the question at once arose whether they should be required to keep the Law of Moses. It is the glory of Paul that he fought for and won freedom for his Gentile fellow-Christians. It is significant of the attitude of the apostles that the decrees of the Council at Jerusalem made no mention of Sabbath observance in the requirements laid upon Gentile Christians (Ac 15:28 f). Paul boldly contended that believers in Jesus, whether Jew or Gentile, were set free from the burdens of the Mosaic Law. Even circumcision counted for nothing, now that men were saved by believing in Jesus (Ga 5:6). Christian liberty as proclaimed by Paul included all days and seasons. A man could observe special days or not, just as his own judgment and conscience might dictate (Ro 14:5 f); but in all such matters one ought to be careful not to put a stumbling block in a brother's way (Ro 14:13 ff). That Paul contended for personal freedom in respect of the Sabbath is made quite clear in Col 2:16 f, where he groups together dietary laws, feast days, new moons and sabbaths. The early Christians brought over into their mode of observing the Lord's Day the best elements of the Jewish Sabbath, without its onerous restrictions.)
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Lesson 3 - Mark 2:13-3:6
Have you had any unbelievers visit or attend your group?  Encourage your men to invite friends who are seeking or open to spiritual things.
The WORD
1. You might want to walk the men through some practical steps of making inductive observations about a passage with this question.  The PRECEPT AUSTIN site has some top notch information and encouragement about inductive Bible study.  The word “observations” links to my blog where I have a short portion of those materials about inductive questions.
3. It is interesting that it was some Pharisees and John the Baptist’s followers who joined in questioning about this.  This makes me wonder whether this might have been an honest question about why the disciples did not observe a practice that most serious followers of God were doing.  Thomas Constable’s Expository Notes and the NET Bible translation and study notes are helpful resources for these verses.
4.  Normally, I would emphasize not taking too much time on something like the Sabbath, but since it will be an issue again, it makes sense to have a good understanding about it.  I have links to multiple word studies, cross references, and articles in this lesson, so you should have ample resources.
5.  I have word study links for angry and grieved, but the real focus should be on whether we are hard hearted.  The WALK question 4 touches on this.
The WALK
1.  The main purpose of this question is to give you an opportunity to explore the principles of being in contact with unbelievers without being influenced by them or yoking ourselves together with them.
2.  We don’t talk much about fasting.  If you have men who fast in your group, this will give them an opportunity to share about their experiences.  Please make sure to mention some of the medical cautions for fasting.  We don’t want someone with diabetes, etc. to go on a strict fast and end up in the hospital.
3. Resting is Biblical and this gives you an opportunity to talk about how to do that.
5. Please make it a point to make note of the gospel points.  It is important for the men to learn to observe how and when the Bible points toward the Gospel. I have organize your discussion around the four points we highlighted in the 2015 summer preaching series on the Gospel. 
The EXTRA
·       I have part of an article about the “Sabbath” from the 1915 International Standard Bible Encyclopedia on page two.
·       There are links to four articles about the Sabbath.  The first two are from non-messianic Jewish sources.  The third contains notes from John MacArthur on why we don’t need to observe the Sabbath as believers.  The last has some historical information about the switch from observing the Sabbath to worshiping on the first day of the week.
·       You probably don’t have time to look at them, but remind the men to keep up with their Mark charts.  I think it will be a valuable and meaningful resource for them when they finish the study.