Wednesday, September 18, 2013

Living Lessons from Dead Kings: Lesson 04 - “Abijiah: Pretence or Practice” - 2 Chronicles 13



Lesson 04 - “Abijiah: Pretence or Practice” -  2 Chronicles 13
 WORD
1. Refer to the article on the queen mother from lesson 4 for more insights on the “queen mother.”
2. David gets a lot of bad press.  This reference helps to put his legacy in the proper perspective.  It will be interesting to notice how often his name comes up throught the record of the kings of Judah.
6. The focus here is on expanding our understanding of faith.
WALK
·       I have structured the application questions to highlight the hypocricy of Abijiah spouting the spiritual superiority of Judah with their lineage from David, temple worship, and Letitical priesthood while walking in his father’s sins with a heart that was disloyal to God.
·       The last question is a springboard to reflect on God’s grace in saving us though we like Abijiah were nothing but a lot of talk when God saved us.
EXTRA (four pages of material)
·       I have included an article that summarizes the chapter from How to Read the Bible for All Its Worth that deals with undterstanding narrative.
·       After the article there is is an outline of principles for interpreting narrative portions of Scripture by a professor at Master’s Seminary.
Lesson 04 - “Abijiah: Pretence or Practice” - 2 Chronicles 13
ID: Inductive Questions (Asking the text questions like who, what, where, when, why, & how?”)
CR: Cross References (Comparing Scripture to Scripture, understanding the vague by the clear.)
WS: Word Study (Understanding definition, theological meaning, and usages in other passages.)
The WORD: What does the Bible say?
Context: Abijiah’s life is recorded in both 1 Kings 15:1-8 and 2 Chronicles 12:16-14:1.  Read 1 Kings 12:1-8 and 2 Chronicles 12:16-14:1.  1 Kings will give you an overview of his rule and 2 Chronicles will highlight a key event in his life.
1.     CR:  (I Kings 15:2,10,13)   Who was Abijam’s mother?  What kind of influence did she probably have on him (2 Chronicles 11:18–22)?
2.     ID:  (I Kings 15:3-5)   Why did God allow Abijam to rule as king?  What does the writer say about David?  What was David’s legacy?  
3.     CR:  (I Kings 15:3)  What were the sins of Abijah’s father (I Kings 14:21-24)? 
4.     ID:   (2 Chronicles 13:5-12)  Why did Abijah say God would give him victory over Jeroboam?
5.     ID:   (2 Chronicles 13:16-18)  Why does the text say God gave Abijah and Judah victory?
6.     WS:   (2 Chronicles 13:18)  What does it mean to rely (sha`an) on God? Judges 16:26; 2 Chronicles 16:7-8; Proverbs 3:5; Isaiah 31:1; Micah 3:11
The WALK: What should I do?
1.     Why would Abijam walk in the sins of his father while keeping  up the outward worship? Is this still an issue today?
2.     What external practices do we use as credentials of our right standing before God (c.f. Matthew 7:21-23)?
3.      Why do we tend to rely on external practices?
4.      How is God’s rescue of Judah from Israel an illustration of our salvation?
Going Beyond:  Of all the events in Abijam’s life that the chronicler could have related, why do you think he chose this one for the post-exilic readers of 1 & 2 Chronicles?
“THE OLD TESTAMENT NARRATIVES: THEIR PROPER USE” is a chapter in How to Read the Bible for All Its Worth by Gordon Fee and Douglas Stuart.  The book is an exceptional resource for learning how to read and interpret the Bible.  This blog article by Rob Berreth provides a helpful summary of the chapter on Old Testament narratives

The Nature of Narratives:
Over 40 percent of the Old Testament is narratives and since the Old Testament constitutes three-quarters of the bible it is no surprise that the single most common type of literature in the entire bible is narrative. Narratives are basically stories. Stories that we refer to as God’s story—a story that is ultimately true, crucially important, and often complex. Their purpose is to show God at work in his creation and among his people. The narratives glorify him, and give us a picture of his providence and protection. They also provide illustrations of many other lessons important to our lives.
Three Levels of Narratives:
Old Testament narratives are told on three levels. The top level is that of the whole universal plan of God worked out through his creation. Key aspects to this level are the initial creation itself; the fall of humanity; the power and ubiquity of sin; the need for redemption; and Christ’s incarnation and sacrifice. The top level is often referred to as the “story of redemption” or the “redemptive history.”
The middle level centers on Israel: the call of Abraham; the establishment of an Abrahamic lineage through the patriarchs; the enslaving of Israel in Egypt; God’s deliverance from bondage and the conquest of the promised land of Canaan; Israel’s frequent sins and increasing disloyalty; God’s patient protection and pleading with them; the ultimate destruction of northern Israel and then of Judah; and the restoration of the holy people after the Exile.
Then there is the bottom level. Here are found all the hundreds of individual narratives that make up the other two levels. Every individual Old Testament narrative is at least part of the greater narrative of Israel’s history in the world, which in turn is part of the ultimate narrative of God’s creation and his redemption of it. This ultimate narrative goes beyond the Old Testament and into the New.
You will not fully do justice to any individual narrative without recognizing its part within the other two. However there is nothing wrong with studying an individual narrative all by itself. But for the fullest sense you must finally see that individual narrative within its larger contexts.
What Narratives Are and Are Not:
1. They are first and foremost stories about what God did to and through people. The Bible is composed of divine narratives, God is the hero of the story.
2. Old Testament narratives are not allegories or stories filled with hidden meanings. But there may be aspects of narratives that are difficult to understand. In other words, narratives do not answer all our questions about a given issue. They are limited in their focus, and give us only one part of the overall picture of what God is doing in history.
3. They do not always teach directly. They emphasize God’s nature and revelation in special ways that legal or doctrinal portions of the Bible never can, by allowing us to live vicariously through events and experiences rather than simply learning about an issue.
4. Each individual narrative or episode within a narrative does not necessarily have a moral all its own. Narratives cannot be interpreted atomistically, as if every statement, every event, every description could, independently of the others, have a special message for the reader. To try and find significance and meaning in each bit of data or each single event in the narrative will not work if not read in light of the larger context and story.
Principles for Interpreting  Narratives:
The following ten principles should help you avoid obvious errors in interpreting whenever you seek to exegete these and other stories.
1.    An Old Testament narrative usually does not directly teach a doctrine.
2.    An Old Testament narrative usually illustrates a doctrine or doctrines taught propositionally elsewhere.
3.    Narratives record what happened—not necessarily what should have happened or what ought to happen every time. Therefore, not every narrative has an individual identifiable moral of the story.
4.    What people do in narratives is not necessarily a good example for us. In fact it is usually the opposite.
5.    Most of the characters in the Old Testament are far from perfect and their actions are too.
6.    We are not always told at the end of a narrative whether what happened was good or bad. We should be able to judge this from what God has taught us elsewhere categorically in the Scriptures.
7.    All narratives are incomplete. Not all the relevant details are always given. What appears is what inspired the author to think important to let us know.
8.    Narratives are not written to answer all of our theological questions. They have particular, specific issues in which they deal with, leaving others to be dealt with elsewhere and in other ways.
9.    Narratives may teach explicitly (by clearly stating something) or implicitly (by clearly implying something without actually saying it).
10.    In the final analysis, God is always the hero of all biblical narratives, and all narratives ultimately find their full purpose and meaning in Jesus.
Some Final Cautions:
Why is it that people often find things in narratives that isn’t really there? First, it is because they are desperate for information that will help them, that will be of personal value that will apply to their own situation. Second, they are impatient; they want their answers now, from this book, from this chapter. Third, they wrongly expect that everything in the Bible directly is instruction for their own individual lives. Here is a list of eight of the most common errors people make when interpreting the bible. These all apply to narratives but are not limited to them.
1.    Allegorizing. Trying to think of meanings beyond the clear intended message.
2.    Decontextualizing. Ignoring the full historical and literary contexts, and often the individual narrative, people concentrate on small units only and thus miss interpretational clues.
3.    Selectivity. Involves picking and choosing specific words and phrases to concentrate on, ignoring the others, and ignoring the overall sweep of the passage being studied.
4.    False Combination. This approach combines elements from here and there in a passage and makes a point out of their combination, even though the elements themselves are not directly connected in the passage itself.
5.    Redefinition. When the plain meaning leaves people cold, they often redefine it to mean something else.
6.    Extracanonical authority. Using external keys to Scripture that claim to unlock the mysteries of truths not otherwise known from Scripture itself.
7.    Moralizing. This assumes that a moral can be drawn from every passage. The fallacy of this approach is that it ignores the fact that the narratives were written to show the progress of God’s history of redemption, not to illustrate principles.
8.    Personalizing. This assumes that every passage applies to you specifically in a way that it may not to others. Do not forget that all parts of the bible are for everyone and ultimately for the Glory of God in displaying Him as the Hero.
No Bible narrative was written specifically about you. You can never assume that God expects you to do exactly the same thing that the Bible characters did, or to have the same things happen to you that happened to them. Narratives are precious to us because they so vividly demonstrate God’s involvement in the world and illustrate his principles and calling. But remember they do not systematically include personal ethics.
(This post is a summary and partial abridgement of Fee And Stuart’s book “How To Read The Bible For All It’s Worth.” It is based solely on Fee And Stuart’s work and any help that this content gives should be credited to God’s grace through their effort. In other words, give God glory, thank Fee and Stuart and buy the book.)
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------.
You might also appreciate “Interpreting the Narratives Portions of Scripture” by Michael Vlach - This is an outline of principles for interpreting narrative portions of Scripture by a professor at Master’s Seminary.

... because they relied on the LORD God of their fathers. 2 Chronicles 13:18



Theological Wordbook of the Old Testament
 2434     שָׁעַן (šāʿan) lean on, trust in. (ASV and RSV similar.) Occurs only in the Niphal.

The verb šāʿan means primarily to lean on something or someone, as on a staff (Ezk 29:7), a spear (II Sam 1:6), or an arm or hand (II Kgs 5:18; 7:2, 17). The latter use probably refers to the relationship of a king to his confidant or second in command. Most importantly the verb is used figuratively of an attitude of trust. Thus in Prov 3:5 we are told not to rely on, šāʿan, our own understanding. Rather we are to trust the Lord. Ezekiel 29:6–7 vividly illustrates both literal and figurative uses of the word. Egypt is a reed staff (mašʿenet) that breaks in the hand of whomever is foolish enough to lean on it (i.e. trust in Egypt). (Cf. also Isa 10:20; 30:12; 31:1; 50:10.) 
Derivatives
2434a  מִשְׁעָן (mišʿān) support. (ASV and RSV, “stay.”) Used four times. Is used figuratively as that on which one relies. David in II Sam 22:19 says that in the day of calamity God was his effective support. In Isa 3:1 it is used of the basic physical life supports, bread and water, that God will remove from Jerusalem. mašʿēn and mašʿēnâ are used in the same passage with similar meaning.
2434b  מַשְׁעֵן (mašʿēn) support. (ASV and RSV “staff.”) Used once.
2434c  מִשְׁעֵנָה (mišʿēnâ) support. (ASV and RSV, “stay.”) Used once.
2434d  מִשְׁעֶנֶת (mišʿenet) staff, support. (ASV and RSV similar.) Used eleven times.   Elijah had one (II Kgs 4:29–31), as did the Angel of the Lord in Jud 6:21 and the nobles depicted in Num 21:18. In Ps 23:4, the Shepherd’s staff is a comfort to His sheep.
Hermann J. Austel, “2434 שָׁעַן,” ed. R. Laird Harris, Gleason L. Archer Jr., and Bruce K. Waltke, Theological Wordbook of the Old Testament (Chicago: Moody Press, 1999), 945.

 -------------------------------------


Strong's 

8172 שָׁעַן [shaʿan /shaw·an/] v. A primitive root; TWOT 2434; GK 9128; 22 occurrences; AV translates as “lean” nine times, “stay” five times, “rely” four times, “rest” three times, and “lieth” once. 1 to lean on, trust in, support. 1a (Niphal) to lean, lean upon, support oneself. 1a1 of trust in God (fig).

James Strong, Enhanced Strong’s Lexicon (Bellingham, WA: Logos Bible Software, 2001). -------------------------------------
Dictionary of Biblical Languages with Semantic Domains

9128 שָׁעַן (šā·ʿǎn): v.; ≡ Str 8172; TWOT 2434—1. LN 23.78–23.87 (nif) lean oneself upon, rest against, i.e., pertaining to being in a resting condition, because one is in a stance or position of reclining, lying, or standing, often against an object for support (Ge 18:4; Jdg 16:26; 2Sa 1:6; 2Ki 5:18; 7:2, 17; Job 8:15; Eze 29:7+), note: see also domain LN 17; 2. LN 85.1–85.31 (nif) lie, i.e., pertaining to being in a certain place (Nu 21:15+); 3. LN 31.82–31.101 (nif) rely on, rest in, depend, i.e., have trust and belief in an object to the point of being in jeopardy if the object of trust fails, as a figurative extension of leaning upon a physical object for support (2Ch 13:18; 14:10[EB 11]; 16:7(2×),8; Job 24:23; Pr 3:5; Isa 10:20(2×); 30:12; 31:1; 50:10; Mic 3:11+)

James Swanson, Dictionary of Biblical Languages with Semantic Domains : Hebrew (Old Testament) (Oak Harbor: Logos Research Systems, Inc., 1997).

Tuesday, September 17, 2013

Living Lesons from Dead Kings: Lesson 03 “Rehoboam’s Regretful Rule” 1 Kings 12, 14; 2 Chron. 10-12

Lesson 3
WORD:

I found myself screaming to myself don’t do that as I read the accounts of Rehoboam’s life.  The questions hit the high and low points of his disappointing reign.  There is one question designed to provoke thought on the mysterious relationship between God’s sovereignty and man’s choices.  Thoughts and discussion, not conclusions, so watch out for theological bunny trails.
WALK:
The questions point the men to think about Biblical leadership, being humble and seeking the Lord, and God’s faithfulness to David through his dealings with Rehoboam.
EXTRA:
These two entries from The IVP Bible Background Commentary: Old Testament  explore the relationship between the “queen mother” and kings of Judah.  This will be especially relevant again when we study Asa.


What in the world were Rehoboam and his punk friends thinking when they promised the nation heavier burdens?  While some of it was probably wanting to rule with a firm hand, these comments by Andrew Hill in The NIV Application Commentary are very insightful.

“At the risk of oversimplifying a complex sociopolitical situation, a combination of interrelated factors make taxation an issue.  The loss of revenue from satellite states that regained their autonomy during the latter years of Solomon’s decline deplete the royal treasuries (1 Kings 11.14-15).  The support of the multilayered bureaucracy of Solomon’s administration suck vast amounts of resources from the general populace (4:20-28).  Finally, all this is compounded by the extravagance and waste characteristic of Solomon’s social and economic policies (10:14-22).

By definition, centralized government is parasitic; that is, it must exist off the revenues it collects from the people governed.  When faced with a budget crisis, any centralized government has but two options: raise taxes or reduce spending.  But a Selman reminds us, when read as complementary records of the division of the united monarchy, both sources concur that Solomon, Rehoboam, and Jeroboam all share in the blame:  Solomon does impose a “heavy yoke” on Israel (2 Chron. 10:4, 9-11, 14), Jeroboam does lead the northern tribes of Israel in revolt (10:19; cf. 13:6-7), Rehoboam does reject the wise advice of the elders (10:6-8, 13).  (Selman, 2 Chronicles, p 359)"

I have been pleasantly surprised by how very relevant many of these issues are to us today.  I am confident that you will see some issues and applications that I have completely missed.  Feel free to bring them up and have your men interact with them.


Encourage your men to read the text earlier in the week so that they will have time to marinate their thoughts with the text over the next few days before your group meets.

Lesson 03 “Rehoboam’s Regretful Rule” 1 Kings 12, 14; 2 Chron. 10-12
ID: Inductive Questions (Asking the text questions like who, what, where, when, why, & how?”)
CR: Cross References (Comparing Scripture to Scripture, understanding the vague by the clear.)
WS: Word Study (Understanding definition, theological meaning, and usages in other passages.)
The WORD: What does the Bible say?
Context: Rehoboam’s life is recorded in both 1 Kings and 2 Chronicles.  Read 1 Kings 12:1-15 and 2 Chronicles 11:1-12:1.  Then read 1 Kings 14:21-24 and 2 Chronicles 12:2-16 to get a “synoptic” account of Rehoboam’s life.  This plan will give you an overview that includes the important facts and interesting details from both accounts.
1.    CR:  (1 Kings 14:21, 31)  Who was Jeraboam’s mother?  How do you think she might have affected him (with her religious orientation probably alluded to in 1 Kings 11:4-7)?
2.    ID:  (1 Kings 12.1-15; 2 Chronicles 10)  Contrast and discuss the leadership styles recommended by Solomon’s advisors and Rehoboam’s friends.  Can you think of Proverbs or NT verses that reinforce the principles?
3.    ID:  (1 Kings 12:15; 2 Chronicles 10:15)  What insight does this verse give for understanding the relationship between people’s choices and God accomplishing His designs?
4.    ID:  (2 Chronicles 11:3-4)  How might you account for Rehoboam’s unexpected wise response to Shemaiah, the man of God?
5.    ID:  (2 Chronicles 12:5-7, 12)  How did Judah avert complete destruction by Shishak?  Why did God not completely deliver them?
6.    ID:  (2 Chron. 12:14)  What does the Chronicler describe as Rehoboam’s core problem?
The WALK: What should I do?
1.    How can we tell if we have surrounded ourselves with wise counselors?
2.    What are the primary objectives for godly leadership?
3.    What does it mean to humble (kana` in 2 Chr. 12.12) yourself before the Lord?  Should we always be humble before the Lord or especially when we are in trouble?
4.    What have you done (or do you do) to “prepare” your heart to seek the Lord?
5.    How do you see God’s faithfulness to his promises in action during Rehoboam’s reign?


The IVP Bible Background Commentary: Old Testament
comments on the “queen mother.”


2 Chronicles 12:13. Rehoboam’s mother. Since Solomon is known to have married women from many countries, including Ammon (see 1 Kings 11:1), it is not unusual that Rehoboam’s mother, Naamah, should be an Ammonite. Her marriage would most likely represent a political alliance between the two countries. The practice of regularly naming the mother of the kings of Judah may indicate that the office of queen mother was significant (see comment on 1 Kings 2:19).     

1 Kings 2:19. queen mother’s throne. There were three different types of queens in the ancient world. The most familiar to our way of thinking is one who is the primary wife of the king (e.g., Queen Esther). While sometimes these royal consorts were little more than ornamentation, in other contexts (such as among the Hittites of the second millennium) they served as royal deputies with extensive power (compare the role of Jezebel in Ahab’s court). A second type is the wife (or mother) of the king who accedes to the throne after his death and rules in his place (e.g., Athaliah of Judah, Hatshepsut of Egypt). The third is the queen mother whose royal husband has died but who continues to exert significant political influence over the new king, her son (e.g., Sammuramat of Assyria, Maacah of Judah, see 1 Kings 15:13). That is the role depicted for Bathsheba here. The extent to which the queen mother exercised a significant or powerful role in judicial, economic or social matters would have depended on the personality of the individual. The fact that the mother is named for nearly every king of Judah (though not for kings of Israel) suggests that the role of queen mother was an important one throughout the Davidic monarchy.

--Victor Harold Matthews, Mark W. Chavalas and John H. Walton, The IVP Bible Background Commentary: Old Testament, electronic ed.,  (Downers Grove, IL: InterVarsity Press, 2000).




 

Living Lesson from Dead Kings: Lesson 02 “How to Ruin a Wise King” 1 Kings 10-11

Lesson 2
WORD:

The primary focus of these questions is to measure how Solomon measured up to the instructions from Deuteronomy in Lesson One.  They will also help to set a trajectory for the lesson about Rehoboam.
WALK:
My main focus here is to think about the influences and tendencies that work against us finishing well.  Solomon seemed to be off to a great start in 2 Chronicles 1:8-9 only to flounder dangerously at the end of his life.
EXTRA:
These two articles are mainly for fun to speculate about just how filthy rich Solomon was.


Lesson 02   “How to Ruin a Wise King”  1 Kings 10-11
ID: Inductive Questions (Asking the text questions like who, what, where, when, why, & how?”)
CR: Cross References (Comparing Scripture to Scripture, understanding the vague by the clear.)
WS: Word Study (Understanding definition, theological meaning, and usages in other passages.)
The WORD: What does the Bible say?
Context:  Review Deuteronomy 17.14-12 and read 1 Kings 10-11.  If you have time, you may want to read 1 Kings 3.1-14 and 9.54-61 to get a sense of his heart earlier in his life. 
1.    CR:  (1 Kings 3:1-14 and 9:54-61)  What were some of Solomon’s positive traits earlier in his life?
2.    ID:  (10:14-24)  What impressed you most about Solomon’s riches?
3.    ID:  (10:26-29)  What were Solomon’s two interests in horses?
4.    ID:  (11.1-8)  Why does the text make a point of listing the countries his wives came from?  When did they turn his heart?  Is that significant?
5.    WS:  (11:5)  The word used to describe how Solomon’s heart was different from David is translated perfect (KJV), loyal (NKJV), faithful (NLT), devoted (NASB, NIV84), and wholly true (ESV).  Do a word study on shalem.  How do the English translations relate to the Hebrew in this context? 
6.    ID:  (11:9-13)  What made God angry with Solomon?  What aggravating circumstances are described?
The WALK: What should I do?
1.    How does this passage make you marvel about Christ (Matthew 12:42; Luke 11:31)?
2.    What effect do you think Solomon’s extensive possessions and interests had on him?  Can you relate to that?
3.    Have your personal relationships ever influenced your devotion to God?
4.    Have there been changes in your devotion to God over the years?  Why?
5.    David and Solomon both left legacies for their children.  What kind of legacy are you leaving for your children and grandchildren?


King Solomon’s Wealth More Than Mr. Gates?
Everyone knows King Solomon’s wealth surpassed anything the ancient world had seen but was he richer than the world’s current richest man, Microsoft founder, Bill Gates? Right now, Gates net worth is estimated at around $40 billion. To his credit, he’s signed a pledge to give half of it away and is at the forefront of a worldwide effort to eradicate AIDS and distribute computers to Third World countries. That aside, let’s take a hypothetical look at the numbers between the two men.
The New International Version of the Bible mentions King Solomon’s yearly salary at 666 talents of gold per year. One talent of gold equals 34.5 kg, which converts to 1109 troy ounces. A ballpark current value of gold is $960 per ounce. Multiply that out and the King’s salary was about $760 million per year. Not bad. Not bad at all. Multiply that by the 40 years he was in power and you end up with a figure of slightly over $30 billion. That’s just salary!
But King Solomon’s wealth would not be complete without accounting for the other property and assets he owned. Horses, land, etc. Plus, we’re figuring that if he was investing by Biblical principles and had God’s voice in his ear, his return on investment would have been a healthy one. Just taking a wild guess, it seems like the King could have been the owner of a net worth that could easily have translated into $100 billion today.
While we’re pretty sure he got no royalties for having authored parts of the Bible, and he did have 700 wives under his care, which surely must have been a serious drain on his budget, but the guy was doing alright, even by today’s standards.

WHAT IS KING SOLOMON'S WEALTH BY TODAY'S MEASURE?
WHAT ABOUT JOHN ROCKEFELLER? ANDREW CARNEGIE? BILL GATES?

The current price of gold is $38,922 per kg. or per 2.2 pounds.
Solomon seems to have gotten 240 + 400 = 640 talents of gold in gifts, or 48000 pounds of gold, that today would be worth $849,207,202.  He also receives 666 talents of gold in income every year (40 years of being king = $35, 348, 252, 727).
Of course, he wouldn't be able to sell all that gold at once or else he would crash the market.
Rockefeller made 1 billion dollars, which would now be worth 318 billion dollars.  Carnegie made 400 million which today would be worth about 186 billion dollars.  Bill Gates is worth a measly 56 billion, which fluctuates with the stock market.
It is really hard to compare wealth across large time periods though; calculating Solomon's wealth today almost makes no sense, most of us have a higher life expectancy and many have a higher standard of living than Solomon did, but can you put a price on being king? Can you put a price on power? Let's just say any of these men could have anything that money could buy.

Living Lessons from Dead Kings: Lesson 01 “How to Be a King” Deut. 17.14-20

Lesson 1
EXTRA:

In the bad ole days we had to spend big bucks to get even a sparse library to help in our Bible study.  Today there are volumes and volumes of good resources available for free online.  I would encourage you to point that out to your men in the introduction comments. 

When I research for new commentaries, these are the sites I go to.
•    Ligonier Ministries Top Commentaries on Every Book of the Bible
•    Annotated Old Testament Bibliography - 2013
•    Best Commentaries: Reviews and ratings of Biblical, theological, and practical Christian works

If you have money burning a hole in your pocket and want some additional resources, these two look promising.

  • 1 & 2 Chronicles (The NIV Application Commentary), by Andrew E. Hil.  It is one thing to understand what the original author of Chronicles was saying to post-exilic Israel, it is another to understand how the teaching of Chronicles applies to the 21st century church. The strength of the NIV Application series is in bridging the gap between the original audience and today’s audience. Hill accomplishes this goal nicely, resulting in a work that will prove especially valuable for pastors and teachers.
  • 2 Chronicles: An Introduction and Commentary  (The Tyndale Old Testament Commentaries) by Martin Selman  As with many other commentaries in the Tyndale series, Selman’s work is clear and concise without being simplistic. This is a good place to begin for laymen who are looking for a basic introduction to the books.
  • 1 Chronicles by Roddy L. Braun and  2 Chronicles by Raymond B. Dillard (Word Biblical Commentary, 1986, 1987).  Although they are on the more technical side, the commentaries by Braun and Dillard in the Word Biblical Commentary series are indispensable for serious study of the text. Each also offers helpful theological insight, sometimes missing from technical commentaries. The layout of the Word Biblical Commentaries can take some getting used to, but in the case of these two works, it is worth the effort.
There are also helpful links to resource materials in the questions.  I usually link to my preference, the NKJV, but the online Bibles I link to can easily be switched to the version of your choice.

WORD:
These questions focus on the things that a king of Israel was supposed to and not supposed to do.  It will help to set the template or standard to measure the kings by.  The word study questions is designed to help you zoom in on the specific desired results for the kings (and us).

WALK:
These requirements for the kings of Israel have applications for us today.  The driving theme should be how we order our world to guide ourselves to walk with the Lord.



Introduction
     French novelist Alphonse Karr observed that the more things change the more they stay the same. While some of the aspects of Kings and Chronicles were specific to that time, there is a wealth of principles and wisdom that is dynamic and relevant for the twenty-first century.  These men struggled with decisions, influences (good and bad), money, religious compromise, enemies, and shifting world affairs they sometimes had little control over.  Sound familiar?  Let’s search how they handled the stuff of life for lessons we can live by today.
     This year’s study focuses more reading Old Testament narrative and less on exegesis and analysis of details in the text.  While there will be some word study and cross reference questions, most questions will focus on  thinking about inductive observations from the text.  Your focus should be more on reading for the big picture and making connections between the struggles and triumphs of Judah’s kings and your own world.
     Beginning at Moses and all the Prophets, Christ expounded in all the Scriptures the things concerning Himself to the disciples traveling to Emmaus.  Christ is the center of the Bible .  As we read and reflect, let’s go beyond the moral lessons of the text to see Christ foreshadowed, represented, and at work in history.
     Make use of the links to online resources in the questions as you do these studies.

Free Online Resources:
Translations:
•    When reading longer passages, many find it helpful to use a more dynamic translation like the NIV84, Living Translation, or NET Bible because they are generally easier to understand. 
•    Great Treasures allows you to see the KJV, NASB, ESV, and NIV84 side by side.  This allows you to read the passage in the more dynamic NIV84 and still have more literal translations there to compare.
•    A synoptic harmony of Chronicles, Kings, Samuel, and other Bible books can be an interesting addition to a study like this. 
The Big Picture:
•    Thomas Constable’s Expository Notes provide a solid commentary on the passages.  They are available as PDF or as part of the NET Bible Learning Environment.
•    The classic work, Bible History: Old Testament, by Alfred Edersheim, provides helpful background on the historical / cultural questions.
The Details:
•    For the times you want to go into more detail, Keil and Delitzsch Biblical Commentary on the Old Testament comments in some detail on almost every verse in the O.T.
•    The copious translation notes in the NET Bible have frequent comments on particular issues in almost every verse.
•    Sometimes a Bible Dictionary or Bible encyclopedia like the WebBible Encyclopedia or the International Standard Bible Encyclopedia (1915) can help if you don’t know what an item is or just want more background.
 
Lesson 01  “How to Be a King” Deut. 17.14-20
ID: Inductive Questions (Asking the text questions like who, what, where, when, why, & how?”)
CR: Cross References (Comparing Scripture to Scripture, understanding the vague by the clear.)
WS: Word Study (Understanding definition, theological meaning, and usages in other passages.)
The WORD: What does the Bible say?
Context:  Read Deuteronomy 17.8-8:7 to help establish some context.  Read the passage again in a more literal or more dynamic translation than you usually use. 
1.    ID:  (14)  What two requirements were given for selecting a king of Israel?
2.    ID:  (16-17)  What three things was a king prohibited from doing?  What common purpose was there for the three prohibitions?
3.    ID:  (18-19a)  What two things was the king commanded to do? 
4.    ID:  (19b-20)  What were the desired results of obeying those commands?
5.    WS:  Pick one or two of the following words and do a word study.
•    fear / Lev. 19:14; Psa. 139:14; Prov. 3:7
•    observe /  Proverbs 7:1; 10:17;19:16
•    lifted above (haughty) / 2 Sam. 22:28; Prov. 30:13
•    turn aside / Prov. 5:7; 9:16; 13:14; 28:9
•    prolong: / Deut. 5:16; 1 Kings 3:14; Prov. 28:16
The WALK: What should I do?
1.    What are your “horses” (resources like retirement, pay check, insurance, etc.) that you look to for strength, security, and protection? 
2.    How do you make prudent preparations without accumulating so many of own resources that you don’t need the Lord?
3.    Why/how would the king’s wives turn his heart from God?  Can a wife help turn your heart toward God?  How do we maximize the positive influence of our wife?
4.    What was expected of the king in the way of Bible reading?  How does that compare to your normal practice?